Monday, August 30, 2010

"Just Water Weight"

Lots of people like to complain about low carb diets. Naysayers are always either trying to convince us that butter, cream, and eggs are bad for us and that we NEED grains to survive, or they're attacking the straw-Atkins-dieter who eats a slab of bacon for every meal and zero vegetables. One of the criticisms that drives me the most crazy, though, is the one where people fully acknowledge low-carbers' impressive results, but they immediately dismiss it as "fake" weight-loss, because "it's just water weight".

I mean, really? Is is so necessary to put successful dieters in their place that we have to resort to devaluing all of their efforts with the notion that because they aren't losing weight "the hard way" (starvation), they aren't really losing it at all?

It only takes reading the science behind any low carb or low glycemic eating plan to understand that once you stop spiking your blood sugar with sugary and starchy foods, you no longer have huge excesses of insulin causing the storage of new fat, and your body goes to work to burn off your current excesses of body fat for energy. You basically become a fat-burning (NOT water-burning) machine.

Now, it's true that while your body is switching over from carb-burning to fat-burning, the initial, almost immediate, weight-drop on an eating plan like Atkins comes from the release of excess water weight. Primal eating expert Mark Sisson has even said that some people can carry 10-20 pounds or more of retained water, depending on their size, due to the highly inflammatory nature of the standard, grain-filled American diet. So those first pounds may not be pure body fat, but does it really matter?

After losing a few pounds of "water weight", my clothes fit better, my face looks less bloated, and I noticeably have more energy and find myself able to move easier. If the first however-many pounds of lost weight on a low carb diet comes from the release of water our bodies had no business carrying around in the first place, I guess I just don't see what the big deal is.

As I see it, successfully de-bloating yourself on your way to fat-burning is "real" weight-loss. It's an initial payoff that tells you you're doing something healthy and right, and it should be a great motivator to keep at it. Don't let anyone try to tell you it doesn't count.

Comments (22)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
PREACH IT, SISTA. This girl lost five pounds of "water weight" in a week, has tons more energy and has never felt better.
1 reply · active 761 weeks ago
It is interesting that as a society, we so badly want to torture ourselves. We think, "I DESERVE to lose weight because I'm depriving myself." And we want to torture anyone who isn't torturing themselves, or at least that's how I explain fat-hate.

I appreciate the water weight argument on one hand, because it allows me to not get discouraged if my weight unexpectedly fluctuates a little. But when I'm dropping clothing sizes, not even caring about dessert, and drinking more water than I ever have, why would I even care if it's "just water weight"?

I do think it's important to keep in mind that the body likes to feed off of muscle along with fat when no carbs are present, so it's important to make sure you're getting enough good carbs, especially on days you're exercising. Not to preach.
2 replies · active 761 weeks ago
I'm interested in the muscle-burning argument, because I hear very conflicting things about it. Obviously, water-weight loss is different than muscle-weight loss, which is why I was sort of careful in the post not to just argue that "all weight loss is good weight loss". But I didn't really mention muscle, because I'm not sure how it works.

I don't remember anyone ever saying we need carbs in order to not burn muscle. Was that covered in the Atkins book under all the stuff about ketosis?
I'm not sure there's evidence that low-carb causes MORE muscles loss than other diets, but there's enough evidence that it scares me into wanting to PUMP SOME IROOOOOOOOON!

There's no good way to stretch out "iron", huh? It always looks stupid.

I don't think the book covered muscle, no, because it didn't cover exercise at all, really. It also didn't cover potential hair loss and liver failure all the other crazy things a crash diet can do to you, because it didn't expect people to use it as a crash diet. All I'm saying is–vegetables!!
This is the weirdest thing ever. I've noticed it so much lately with Ryan low-carbing it. People are really quick to criticize or say negative things rather than saying, "Wow you look great," or "Way to go! I'm proud of you." The other day a friend of our said, "...Yeah but didn't Atkins die of a heart attack?" Translation: you are going to die of a heart attack. I think it's just plain rude. How about supporting someone rather than bringing them down for actually doing something good for themselves, their health, and their body.
2 replies · active 761 weeks ago
The Atkins-death argument is one of my favorites, too!

The man died from SLIPPING ON ICE and suffering a major head injury, people. NOT from eating a low carb diet. Geez.

I swear all of the negative ideas about it is why so many people just keep it a secret. It's amazing that pretty much all of Hollywood cuts carbs to stay thin, and yet few of them ever fess up and instead just say they're "eating right and exercising".
It's very strange, because it's not like a zillion people haven't tried low-calorie diets and totally failed. Here's a diet that's actually working for Ryan and for Tracey and me, and yet people are scared of it just because it's different.

At work the other day, I sent a friend an article Tracey had sent to me about why grains aren't necessary at all in the human diet, thinking he would be interested in either learning something new or at least opening up his mind to the idea. Instead, he totally berated people for not eating grains, and I was like, "Uhh . . . why do you CARE so much?"

I know that low-calorie and low-fat aren't right for me, but I know it works for some people, so why would it bother me if someone chooses that way of eating?
wow. You mean I was carrying around 105 pounds of water and eating low carb helped me to lose that? I don't care if is 'water weight" I lost it and I am happy and feel wonderful. LOL
3 replies · active 761 weeks ago
HA. I know, right? I don't know what sense the naysayers are supposed to make out of people who lose significant amounts of weight on low carb plans.

Speaking of which, I guess I never realized you had lost quite that much. That's so awesome!
Yep. My before and after pics are on the blog. I went from a size 22 to a size 8 and I feel wonderful. I am not on any medications to control my Diabetes and life is wonderful. I get to watch my grandson grow up and when he says, "Run. Maw maw. Run" when we go to the park I can run with him and not get winded. Life is WONDERFUL!
This makes me want to go home and try to pee out a person. Or twins, really.
Very well said!
Grace's story is radtastic. I think the south beach/atkins approach is probably BEST for people with diabetes/blood sugar issues.

Here's my point, though. Don't you feel like people are that judgy and preachy with everything? I mean, if I tell a music lover I don't like Bob Dylan, I guarantee that people will tell me why I'm wrong. If I want to buy a car, if I want to build a fence, if I want to cook marinara sauce, people will tell me that they know what's best, and how very, very wrong I am if I don't agree.

The reasons this issue tends to be so contentious, I think, are that a) Everyone eats, so we all think we're experts. And b) Weight and eating are so fucking personal that, although we all love giving advice about food, none of us much cares for hearing anyone else's advice. Imagine if there were different ways to breathe, and if all of those affected how much energy you had. "Oh, I always do 'in-nose-out-eyeball-in-bellybutton-out-butthole.' You leave out your butthole? That's absurd! People have been breathing out of their buttholes for eons!"

OK, maybe I just went a little too far with the metaphor. But y'all get the point?
2 replies · active 761 weeks ago
This is why I hate that the federal government had to go and decide for us that there's a "right" way to eat that involves bagels for every meal. And everyone loves to cite the food pyramid as scripture, totally ignoring that whole use-sugars-sparingly thing.
I totally agree that we're all somehow sort of naturally resistant to things that other people try to tell us are great. It's amazing, though, when people are so set in their ways that there's no chance they could be open to someone doing something differently than what they think is "the right way".
People's issues with the diets of others are totally weird. I mean, it's not a secret that carbs make you fat, but it's also true that not everyone who eats them is fat. Not everyone needs to go low (or no) carb, but for some skinny marathoner who eats a box of mac and cheese every night to suggest that their diet is ideal for everyone isn't any more correct. Its a weird place when everyone wants to start fighting about whether it's healthier to eat some whole grain pasta or a steak, and then everyone ends up kind of screaming like evangelicals to prove their point and there's all these pots calling kettles and such. I just can't figure out why anyone cares so much - if you hate someone for being fat, and then they become not fat, why then hate them for the manner in which they achieved that? I'll fully admit that no one is ever going to convince me not to eat fruits or vegetables with the argument that they are unhealthy for me due to carbs and sugar, but I also couldn't be paid to care if the way someone chooses to drop pounds includes drinking heavy cream through a straw. Whatever works, and everyone's different.
3 replies · active 761 weeks ago
This reminds me of a story. But crap, now I have to post about it instead of telling you directly. I'll cite you in the post, though, if that helps.

Also, I would never tell someone not to eat fruits and vegetables! Atkins tells you not to eat them for the first two weeks just to regulate your sugar addiction, but you add berries in right after that. Just so you don't think we're freaks.
Oh, I don't think you guys are freaks who would take away my blueberries. This blog definitely comes across as a chronicling of your decision to go low-carb and subsequent lifestyle, with some interesting forays into feminism and mental processes, not as a platform to preach your diet gospel or anything. My rant-y comment was just directed at the world at large, as they usually are. People are just so up in everyone's business and liking to tell them how they need to do things a different way, YOU KNOW? Maybe I'm projecting this week. This week is kind of cramping my style.

Also, yes, this is me, Judgiest Woman On The Eastern Seaboard, judging others for judging. Whew. I'm a go judge someone for wearing flip-flops as semi-formal wear now.
I love that you're using so many religious terms to describe the diet wars, because that's SO how it comes off sometimes. One of the biggest low carb bloggers out there, for example, actually refers to himself as an "evangelist". Creepy! I'm already not a religious person. The last thing I need is to try to turn FOOD into a religion.
I do the Dr. Bernstein's Diet. It is low carb and you get more carbs than on Atkins. I tried South Beach and my glucose levels were high for some reason. I got a bit stricter with Dr. Bernsteins and now my glucose levels are around 100 or below at all times. ____I agree with the above poster that not everyone should do the exact same diet. What works for you is important for you. I just know that I had to do Dr. Bernstein's way to control my glucose and Diabetes without taking medication. That was my goal. I was diagnosed a few days after my grandson was born. I decided right then that I was going to live to see him grow up and marry. I couldn't do that if I didn't take control of my health and my weight. ____Do what works for you and don't let anyone tell you that you shouldn't do it.
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
Huh. I've actually never heard of that one, but it sounds great. When I get really serious about weight-loss, I always default to Atkins Induction, but I really do think the carbs in the initial stages on Atkins are much lower than what I'm comfortable with for everyday life. Part of my problem is that I lose patience with it before I ever make it up discovering what that perfect number of carbs is for my body.
I think South Beach would be good for me if it didn't cut out so much fat. I like reading South Beach recipes, but I don't think I'd be a very happy person on that diet.

Post a new comment

Comments by